Hot Chip: One Life Stand (EMI)

 |   |  1 min read

Hot Chip: Brothers
Hot Chip: One Life Stand (EMI)

Artists should not be held to their press releases, but after a couple of tracks of wimp-pop for disco-cum-dance clubs you have to wonder why the promo sheet on this album speaks of it being "awash with Hot Chip's trademark creative bravery and a searing emotional intensity from first track to last".

Sorry, bullshit on both counts.

This is clever and sometimes slightly interesting programmed pop which borrows from predecessors (no problem on that front) but is hardly groundbreaking on any musical level.

At all.

And brave? Emotional intensity?

Don't make me laugh.

Needless to say it will be huge: it frequently delivers clubby hands-in-the-air dance with some suggestion of the ache that Marc Almond brought to the genre (but not even close, sorry)--  but seems remarkably free of emotional committment, despite lyrics which in other hands could have actually meant something.

This -- for me, such things will hardly trouble clubbers -- is a major disappointment having seen these guys bring a roof down.

But this feels too calculated, too manicured and far too disengaged to even remotely refer to Northern Soul, gospel (oh pleeease!), Detroit House, Southern soul, Arthur Russell (double pleeease!) and Prince that they would have you believe.

Seems a shame that Charles Hayward -- who was in the genuinely innovative and creatively brave outfit This Heat -- should be co-opted into this (of his own volition of course).

A couple of good pop songs (the beautiful Brothers, which cries out for a cover) but mostly this is a thrill-free zone.

No, we shouldn't hold musicians to their press releases, but we should assume they read them and give them the tick off. In this case then they are deluding themselves if they believed we'd believe the claims it/they make for this rather superficial outing. 

Share It

Your Comments

al doyle - Feb 2, 2010

granted the press release was awful, terrible waffle - but in our defence it actually WAS put out there without our reading and approving it. Record label were reprimanded etc etc. Sorry the album was a disappointment, al.

post a comment

More from this section   Music articles index

Ringo Starr: Ringo 2012 (Hip-O/Universal)

Ringo Starr: Ringo 2012 (Hip-O/Universal)

It's a shame the most interesting Beatles at the time of their 1970 break-up – Lennon and Harrison – are no longer with us, because the post-Beatles legacy is carried into the second... > Read more

Sleater-Kinney: No Cities to Love (Sub Pop)

Sleater-Kinney: No Cities to Love (Sub Pop)

If you are bit over bands reforming to tour their classic album or just to pick up the cheque, then put aside such cynicism for this, the return album from former riot grrrls Sleater-Kinney who... > Read more

Elsewhere at Elsewhere

MATTHEW SWEET INTERVIEWED (1993): It should be a more Sweet world

MATTHEW SWEET INTERVIEWED (1993): It should be a more Sweet world

Matthew Sweet comes with a double handicap: the unthreatening “Matthew” and then . . . “Sweet” Hmm, very soft, very sweet. It isn’t a promising start and he... > Read more

Renee Geyer: You Broke a Beautiful Thing (1999)

Renee Geyer: You Broke a Beautiful Thing (1999)

Lord knows some artists can be "difficult" -- and many of those who have tried to interview Australian Renee Geyer (never my doubtful pleasure) have returned chastened, frustrated and... > Read more