THE SIXTIES by ARTHUR MARWICK: The big picture of the isms and schsims

 |   |  2 min read

The Crazy World of Arthur Brown: Fire
THE SIXTIES by ARTHUR MARWICK: The big picture of the isms and schsims

One of the more mindlessly amusing one-liners about the Sixties says that if you remember them t.hen you weren’t there. Duh.

That sitcom aphorism reduces the decade to flakiness and drugs, and bears no serious scrutiny at all.

By rule-of-thumb and common consensus, what are loosely called the Sixties are the five years between She Loves You and Woodstock, a period which witnessed extraordinary social change - the distance between “l wanna hold your hand” and “I'd love to turn you on.”

But considering the period by reference to popular culture and its soundtrack is witless laziness and is perpetrated in the recent documentaries about Vietnam which saddle the images with the Doors’ The End, a legacy of Apocalypse Now, and not of the free-fire zone.

The period was more than marijuana and the Maharishi - and nostalgia for Beatlemania or footage of American soldiers burning Vietnamese villages denies the complex sociopolitical movements, vibrancy of international socialism, civil rights campaigns and the speed of communication which took the images of dissent and violent protest into homes across the Western world.

In this far-flung corner we knew the names of activists as disparate as Tariq Ali, Jerry Rubin and Danny the Red, even if the nuances of their different perspectives were flattened out by the tyranny of distance and lack of internal debate.

Strict periodicism fails to take into account the factors which shaped the start of the decade and the impetus the various social movements carried into subsequent years.

ln this intelligent, digressive and inclusive 800-page tome, Arthur Marwick (a founding professor at that most Sixties of institutions, the Open University) takes a broader view and establishes the premise of a cultural revolution starting in 1958 and ending around 1974.

He denies the old Received Disadvantage Point of the period and, while addressing Vietnam, Bobby Seale, Sgt Peppers and so on, recognises that life in Nuremberg in 1966 was very different to that in New Jersey despite the pervasiveness of the Beatles/Dylan/Stones soundtrack, and what reductive sitcoms, social philosophers and blue-jean sociologists might think.

In chapters on subjects as diverse as concepts of beauty and the impact of new ideologies on town planning, Marwick acknowledges that for some people the Sixties were about crippling mortgages as much as Charles Manson, and that citizens of a nation under a gun or a Soviet-tank invasion tend to define freedom very differently from those protesting outside a Democratic convention in Chicago.

Marwick weaves simultaneous but obviously very different experiences - whether they be psychedelics or surrealism in films, national identity or activists drawn to radical violence - into a cohesive web.

In popular culture he can be wrong-headed (elevating films such as Darling and The Ipcress File, calling Peter Sellers “a character actor”) and he unashamedly interposes the clunking first-person-singular pronoun on occasion. You sense he is better with the big picture than condescending into the proletarian world of the Monkees -and The Avengers.

That said, The Sixties is an admirable overview of very different cultural contexts during this dynamic period.

With useful statistics, a largely unacademic text and provocative dissections of political movements and underground idealism, he distils to the sometimes uncomfortable essences.

So if you were there but can’t remember it, let Marwick be your guide to what you missed.

And for anyone who thought it was all acid, Hendrix and Alan Alda sermonising on M*A*S*H, this will allow you to filter-feed the isms and schisms of a confusing, diverse, politically charged period. A time which, lest we forget in the rush to embrace greatest hits and the marketing of the decade, came with some really lousy music too - none of which Marwick has the poor grace to single out.

Unexpectedly interesting, and a useful reference as well.

Share It

Your Comments

post a comment

More from this section   Writing articles index

GRIFFITH REVIEW: FOOD CHAIN edited by JULIANNE SCHULTZ

GRIFFITH REVIEW: FOOD CHAIN edited by JULIANNE SCHULTZ

At regular lunches with a group of friends last year our conversation frequently turned to food, and not what was on our plates. We would discuss what might be called the politics of food: how... > Read more

STONED by ANDREW LOOG OLDHAM: Would you let your daughter meet Andrew?

STONED by ANDREW LOOG OLDHAM: Would you let your daughter meet Andrew?

Andrew Loog Oldham enjoyed considerable notoriety in the early Sixties as the young manager/producer of the Rolling Stones. He hit the headlines in his own right for his liner notes to a Stones LP... > Read more

Elsewhere at Elsewhere

Ry Cooder: My Name is Buddy (Warners)

Ry Cooder: My Name is Buddy (Warners)

Albums under Ry Cooder's name once only sold in the hundreds. But these days -- through high profile soundtracks such as Paris, Texas, The Long Riders and Trespass, internationally acclaimed work... > Read more

HENRYK GORECKI, THE SORROWFUL SYMPHONY (1993): Capturing the spirit of the age, and marketing

HENRYK GORECKI, THE SORROWFUL SYMPHONY (1993): Capturing the spirit of the age, and marketing

When Billboard magazine – the bible of the international music industry – put classical music on its cover in September '92 with the heading “It’s Cool Again!” there... > Read more