THE FATE OF THE NU: Something old, new, borrowed and Blue Note

 |   |  5 min read

Bob Belden Project/DJ Smash: Come Together (DJ Kingsize remix, with Dianne Reeves, Bob Belden Project, Cassandra Wilson)
THE FATE OF THE NU: Something old, new, borrowed and Blue Note

Pity any movement that describes itself as “New . . .” or, worse, “the future”. By definition i is fated to an inevitable and humiliatingly early grave when the next “new” movement, or something else promising to be “the future”, arrives.

Back in the late Sixties and early Seventies, new movements, promising to be the future of jazz, arrived with remarkable frequency. Many came with a code of practice or a mission statement. 

All eventually just found themselves alongside that which they intended to replace and, with alarming rapidity, those which replaced them.

ln the Sixties, fusion -- when rock met jazz, usually at one of Bill Graham’s Filmore's -- was the first big New Future for jazz, but simultaneously there was also politicised Free Jazz (as opposed to that propounded by Ornette Coleman) and Third Stream (where American avant-garde jazz intersected with European classical music).

However, for anyone discovering Third Stream in the late Sixties (say the work of classically trained composer/critic Gunther Schuller and the algebraic music of Anthony Braxton) it was disconcerting to learn these musical streams had merged as far back as Stan Kenton in the late Forties.

What was more alarming, at the time of prog-rock and fusion, was that Kenton described his music as “progressive” and that term, with all its implications of New and the Future, had also been liberally applied to Dave Brubeck and other “cool” jazz in the Fifties.

All these styles juggled alongside each other in the Seventies, so in a weird way Wynton Marsalis’ neo-conservative movement of the Eighties was a relief.

It was back-to-the-future to rediscover origins for further exploration . . . although what actually happened was it went back and stayed there, all buttoned up in beautiful suits.

Reading liner notes on neo-con albums, especially those by Marsalis’ unbearable cheerleader Stanley Crouch, was always amusing. If Wynton wasn’t the future then he was, at the very least, a new Messiah who could forgive your Free Jazz and funk sins, and was in the pantheon alongside Louis, Duke and Miles. Whew, such a lot for such narrow shoulders.

Liner notes are often problematic.

If they aren’t a historical overview on a compilation but for a new band or artist, the best they can hope to do is place the music and musician in a context, and convey some sense of enthusiasm. Promising something New or the Future is fatal. When acid jazz emerged in the late Eighties there was the widespread belief, especially among young writers and critics, that it was going to save jazz from becoming moribund (although quite how playing Fifties and Sixties jazz grooves could be “new” or even “nu-” was another question).

Once the turntablists arrived and started mixing and reshaping those grooves over beats and samples something truly interesting was happening. The breakthrough Us3 album, Hand on the Torch, a decade ago -- featuring their makeover of Herbie Hancock’s Cantaloupe Island as Cantaloop which became a clubland favourite -- showed what was possible when canny Nineties people were given access to a great jazz catalogue.

Blue Note had opened its vaults to them and their commercial and artistic success lead to other jazz labels, notably Verve, doing the same.

Blue Note, a historic label finding its place in the new era (and doing nicely now thanks to Norah Jones, Medeski Martin & Wood, Cassandra Wilson, Charlie Hunter, The Bird and the Bee among others), unlocked the strongroom for other remixers.

DJ Smash (Wayne Hunter from New York) produced two volumes in his Phonography series which collected Blue Note acts remixed by the likes of Guru, Todd Terry, Us3, DJ Spinna, DJ Spooky and Joe Claussell alongside cutting edge contemporary tracks (Greg Osby, Charlie Hunter, Marc Moulin, St Germain) that need no such tampering to fit into the clubland, groove-orientated ethic.phono1

The first Phonography included thumping house versions of Smash’s remix of the Bob Belden Projects treatment of the Beatles’ Come Together (featuring Cassandra Wilson and Dianne Reeves), followed seamlessly by the Claussell remix of Tolon Willie (with Salif Keita and Grace Jones), then his mix of Ronny Jordan’s London Lowdown that leads into St Germain’s very-Brubeck Rose Rouge remixed by Blaze (who unfortunately choose to remove the superb drum part and replace with a house-thump).

Those are just the final four tracks which took the album out in booty-shakin’ style. Before them Guru has taken on Medeski, Martin & Woods Whatever Happened to Gus (featuring Guru himself), Spinna has worked over another Ronny Jordan cut and Nitin Sawhney took Us3's Come on Everybody.

Phonography 2 followed much the same pattern; some urban funk-lite upfront (Hunter's Street Sounds, Osby‘s Poetry in Motion and Soulive's wah-wah tickling Bridge to Bama (remixed by Hi Tek) and the pace picking up later.

Wouldn’t give you much for Belden’s sexless version of Prince’s Kiss, remixed or otherwise however, but elsewhere the album juggled the remix and originals adeptly and enjoyably. And Claussell’s remix of the Wild Magnolias Battlefield was deeply funky.

But, and this was surprising for an album by someone out of the famous Giant Steps parties, as with Phonography 1, it again went past without much notice. Maybe the jazzy grooves were getting a little passe as people searched for another New Future?

Certainly the liner notes to the first volume may have put a few off, especially if you’ve seen new messiahs and movements come and go.

Tom Terrell claimed Smash as arguably the most fully-formed visionary of all remixer/producers.

And Smash hailed himself as "a committed die-hard musical anarchist”. Well, sorry to tell you Tom and Smash, these two albums were respectful of the Blue Note tradition, and many others explored similar territory with equal style.

Nope, it wasn't "New" (or “nu-”) and it wasn't the Future.

It was, at the time, just a pretty good "Now".

And didn't all those remixers of that early 2000's "Now" recede with humiliating rapidity into the Past?


Share It

Your Comments

post a comment

More from this section   Jazz articles index

MURRAY McNABB (1947-2013): The new man with the courage to make himself new

MURRAY McNABB (1947-2013): The new man with the courage to make himself new

The plan would have been timely: a concert acknowledging the half century he'd known and played in bands with drummer Frank Gibson. But then everything changed. “They gave me a year,... > Read more

MILES DAVIS IN CONCERT 1988 REVIEWED: The Prince claims the crown

MILES DAVIS IN CONCERT 1988 REVIEWED: The Prince claims the crown

For even the most devout Miles Davis follower, it was difficult to anticipate what the legendary trumpeter would pull out for his one-only Auckland concert. Recent albums weren’t helpful... > Read more

Elsewhere at Elsewhere

ELMORE JAMES: Sliding with the king

ELMORE JAMES: Sliding with the king

It has been almost half a century since Elmore James bent over to pull up his socks before going out to play in an Chicago nightclub . . . and went face down on to the floor with his third and... > Read more

PAUL McCARTNEY INTERVIEWED (2010): Band on the Run remastered

PAUL McCARTNEY INTERVIEWED (2010): Band on the Run remastered

While Elsewhere always does its own interviews, this one provided to coincide with the remastered version of Band on the Run -- which launches a whole McCartney remaster/reissue series -- is... > Read more